Published
Governing AI at the Edge: Risk, Ethics, and Compliance in Global Data Center Infrastructure
Published in Volume 3 Issue 2 (April-June 2026) (Vol. 3, Issue 2, 2026)

Keywords
Sovereign AI governanceethical riskcompliancedata center infrastructurecross-border data flowsdata localizationdata sovereigntyAI-enabled infrastructureaccountabilitycloud computingedge computingregulatory harmonizationfailure modesoperational resiliencelegal riskjurisdictional fragmentationconflict of lawsliability.
Abstract
Ethics-driven governance of AI-enabled global data center infrastructure is pivotal for protecting security and privacy interests across borders. A multilayered compliance architecture—including risk assessment methodologies, technical mechanisms, established roles, and a set of policy instruments—supports ethical risk and sovereign compliance across the data center ecosystem. Ethical risk management comprises privacy-preserving data flows, lifecycle security, and AI governance. Because ethical risk spans the global ecosystem, fostering collaboration and commonality builds trust and reduces burden while buttressing legitimacy. Thus, private and public interests align. Sovereign AI governance is an essential enabler of the regionally sovereign world of such infrastructure.
AI is reshaping the global digital landscape, including the infrastructure of its cloud and edge components. At the same time, the reliance on such AI-systems and the attendant cross-border exchange of data are raising concerns—notably, for security, privacy, democracy, and human rights. Addressing these ethical issues is a pressing requirement. However, the prevailing compliance frameworks for cross-border data flows and AI systems provide neither the tools nor the appropriate level of granularity for Ethical Risk Management in this context. A distinctive multilayered Compliance Architecture is thus put forward that is adapted specifically to the Ethical Risks associated with AI-enabled Global Data Center Infrastructure, namely, that of Operational Resilience, Legal Certainty, and the protection of Security, Privacy & Human Rights.
References
- [1][1] Albulayhi, O. (2026). AI governance risk tiering for sustainable digital transformation. Sustainability, 18(6), 2986.
- [2][2] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). AI, data governance and privacy: Synergies and areas of international co-operation. OECD Publishing.
- [3][3] Papagiannidis, E., et al. (2025). Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
- [4][4] Freeman, S., et al. (2025). Developing an AI governance framework for safe and ethical deployment. Journal of Responsible Technology.
- [5][5] Batool, A., Zowghi, D., & Bano, M. (2023). Responsible AI governance: A systematic literature review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10896.
- [6][6] Mäntymäki, M., Minkkinen, M., Birkstedt, T., & Viljanen, M. (2022). Putting AI ethics into practice: The hourglass model of organizational AI governance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00335.
- [7][7] Samarawickrama, M. (2022). AI governance and ethics framework for sustainable AI and sustainability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08984.
- [8][8] Corrêa, N. K., Galvão, C., Santos, J. W., et al. (2022). Worldwide AI ethics: A review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.11922.
- [9][9] OECD AI Policy Observatory. (2024). AI governance and regulatory developments. OECD Publishing.
- [10][10] European Commission. (2024). EU artificial intelligence act: Regulatory framework for trustworthy AI.
- [11][11] PSA Office of the Government of India. (2026). AI techno-legal governance framework for data and innovation.
- [12][12] Aligned AI Research Group. (2025). Data and AI governance: Promoting equity, ethics, and accountability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.03970.
- [13][13] Springer Nature. (2025). Ethical AI standards and governance frameworks. In Encyclopedia of AI ethics and governance.
- [14][14] Government of Egypt AI Council. (2025). Global AI governance frameworks: A comparative study.
- [15][15] IEEE Standards Association. (2023). Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human well-being with AI systems.
- [16][16] NIST. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
- [17][17] World Economic Forum. (2023). Governance framework for responsible AI deployment.
- [18][18] Council of Europe. (2024). Framework convention on artificial intelligence and human rights, democracy and rule of law.
- [19][19] Linux Foundation AI & Data. (2024). Trustworthy AI governance and compliance frameworks for conversational systems.
- [20][20] AI Governance Day Consortium. (2024). From principles to implementation: Global AI governance report.
Authors (1)
Download Article
Best for printing and citation
File size: 0.7 MB
Format: PDF
Download Article
Best for printing and citation
File size: 0.7 MB
Format: PDF
Article Information
jaibdd230075
jaibdd-01-000074
2026-05-18
Article Impact
Views:2,691
Downloads:869
How to Cite
Boga (2026). Governing AI at the Edge: Risk, Ethics, and Compliance in Global Data Center Infrastructure. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Disciplines, 3(2), xx-xx. https://jaibdd.com/articles/jaibdd230075
